Gareth's Blog

Recent Posts


News & Views from the front line

21 November 2014

We are all ethical - until we go to work...

business angel

Interesting piece of research doing the rounds in the media where they found that bankers were more honest when they weren't thinking about being bankers. This suggests that bankers aren't inherently more unethical than the rest of us, but rather that the culture of modern banking is responsible for LIBOR, Forex, PPI and all the other banking scandals.

Culture is an incredibly powerful force - for good or bad. It is incredible how resilient culture is to change, particularly in larger organisations where you get what I call 'institutional inertia'. Management legend Peter Drucker (is said to have) put it like this:

Culture eats strategy for breakfast.

If you want to change anything for the better - ethics, social impacts, environmental performance - you better start with the culture.

But Drucker also said:

Company cultures are like country cultures. Never try to change one. Try, instead, to work with what you’ve got.

This is the essence of Green Jujitsu - work out where the overlap between the existing culture and sustainability sits - and use this as the entry point. It applies just as well to ethical/social issues as it does to green issues.


Tags: , , ,

Posted by Gareth Kane no responses

19 November 2014

Interview with Paul Taylor, Sustainability Manager, Camira Fabrics

paul taylorHere's an extract of an interview I did with Paul Taylor, Sustainability Manager of Camira Fabrics over the summer. Camira Fabrics is the biggest producer of commercial fabrics in the UK, producing 9 million metres of fabric per year, employing 600 people and turning over £70 million. Paul has since left the company, but there are some great nuggets of wisdom in here which we can all learn from.

How did you first get involved in sustainability?

You could say it started when I was five years old. I lived in Central London, surrounded by concrete, and I just felt claustrophobic. For one week a year we went to West Sussex to stay with a relative because the family couldn’t afford a holiday. But on the South Coast, when you are exposed for one week a year in the summer to coast line, marshes, sunsets, sky – it’s extraordinary the impact it has on you. Eventually I went off and studied environmental management and geomorphology – that was my passion to understand the world and to find a route where I could have a positive impact on it.

I started my professional life as a community development officer in Central London, because sustainability options weren’t open to me at that time. But those years taught me about how to have an impact on people and I decided that I had to find a career in sustainability. So it was apply for a job anywhere – pin on a map – and the first opportunity was at Middlesbrough Environment City. I had the opportunity to work on a project which was all about Agenda 21 and the world opened up. The path since has taken me through some dark days in the public sector, but nevertheless, it was a great, great experience. It was about realising you can’t just change the world from the bottom up, you have to have the policy from the top down as well – for a positive contribution you need to do both. And the path led me here, to Camira.

What’s the history of sustainability at Camira?

Camira has only been around since 1974. We started out as Camborne Fabrics, a textile supplier, and we began manufacturing here in Mirfield in 1987, and grew very quickly despite the perception that textiles production in the UK was declining. The big change happened when Camborne was bought by Interface in the late 1990s and became part of a company whose whole drive was around sustainability – and using sustainability to grow the business, not just as a bolt on. Camira was born in 2006 when there was a management buy-out from Interface. So we were born with a culture of sustainability, wholly owned by directors and investors who had seen what sustainability could do for a business. The turnover was £26m in 2006, now it’s £70m. And that’s been purely from a drive for sustainability- in terms of people understanding it, getting the processes right and the whole idea of leaving behind a better world than the one you found.

How do you induct new employees into the culture?

Well we have a new laboratory manager starting this week and on day 3 I have her for half a day informal discussion on sustainability. Every single new person who walks through the door gets that half day – and we learn from it too – what their previous experience of sustainability has been. Read the rest of this entry »

Tags: , , , ,

Posted by Gareth Kane no responses

17 November 2014

A neat trick to engage your boss in sustainability

Tony_Abbott_-_2010An interesting thing happened at the G20 summit which took place in Australia over the weekend. Aussie premier Tony Abbott (right) is one of the few pro-coal, anti-climate action leaders in the world, but he ended up signing a communiqué including the following phrases:

We support strong and effective action to address climate change.

We reaffirm our commitment to rationalise and phase out inefficient fossil fuel subsidies.

(I've stripped out the detail to focus on the commitments)

How did this happen?

A: Peer pressure.

With the weight of the leaders of the world's greatest economies pressing down on him, Abbott crumbled and signed. Whether he will act is another matter, but he signed - a significant step that he can be reminded of if he doesn't act.

How can you perform a similar miracle in your business if the boss, or one of the bosses, isn't interested?

Look to their peers and identify those who are taking sustainability seriously. Those peers could be individuals or they could be organisations. Then ask yourself: Are your competitors doing better on sustainability? Well, constantly compare your organisation to the best. Are you a member of a trade organisation? Suggest your boss gives a presentation on your sustainability programme. Has an individual peer been recognised? Work that into your communications.

The G20 showed that peer pressure works. Use it.

Photo © MystifyMe Concert Photography (Troy) Creative Commons License


Tags: , ,

Posted by Gareth Kane no responses

14 November 2014

Should we be exploring space when life on earth is unsustainable?


Like much of the population on Wednesday, I was gripped by the Rosetta mission to the comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko. Never mind that it's parked worse than my car on a Saturday morning trip to B&Q with a hangover, as an engineer, I cannot help but marvel at the sheer ambition of propelling a probe the size of a fridge 300 million miles through space (as the astrocrow flies), slingshotting it around planets and landing on a lump of rock less than 3 miles across.

But, as an old colleague pointed out, is this really a good use of resources and ingenuity when we face the challenges of climate change, resource depletion and global poverty?

That's a toughie.

But here's the way I look at it:

  • There is no 'or' here - we can do both. There is plenty of money to tackle global problems, what we need is political will and co-operation. If it was an either-or choice, then obviously we should prioritise sustainability, but it isn't.
  • Space exploration has already told us a lot about our planet and we rely on satellites and their technology whether monitoring the ozone layer, measuring the energy imbalance that is driving climate change, or warning of drought conditions.
  • OK, the Rosetta mission isn't about the earth. But the challenge is driving forward important technological advances in everything from solar panels to data analysis via environmental sensors.

So, I'm happy to spend billions pushing forward this kind of exploration, as long as we spend commensurate billions back here on earth sorting out our own backyard.


Tags: ,

Posted by Gareth Kane no responses

12 November 2014

The military has climate change in its sights


Despite all the jibes about 'military intelligence being an oxymoron', armed forces around the world spend an awful lot of time and effort analysing geopolitical trends, identifying potential causes of conflict and scoping out what preparation is required. Back in my days at the Ministry of Defence in the mid-90s, water resources were regarded as a key flashpoint, but in recent weeks both the US and UK military have come out to say that climate change is a major risk to national security and peace.

The Pentagon’s 2014 Climate Change Adaptation Roadmap says:

“Climate change will affect the Department of Defense’s ability to defend the Nation and poses immediate risks.”

Rear Admiral Neil Morisetti told UK MPs earlier this week:

“Climate change will require more deployment of British military in conflict prevention, conflict resolution or responding to increased humanitarian requirements due to extreme weather impacts. It is posing a risk to geopolitical security, which is a prerequisite for economic growth, good health and wellbeing for all of us.”

The military isn't renowned for its wishy-washy lefty-liberal tree-hugging. If they see risks, we can be pretty sure those risks need to be considered seriously.

I had hoped that such unequivocal statements and respect for the military from the political right would jolt the latter out of their doubts about climate change science.

But no.

In May, Republicans in the US Congress passed an amendment to stop the Department of Defense from spending money on any climate-related initiatives, including planning programs. Republican David McKinley put it like this “This amendment will ensure we maximize our military might without diverting funds for a politically motivated agenda.” The Democrat-controlled Senate threw the amendment out (source Businessweek). The mid-term election results mean that the US is likely to see more such moves, not less, for the foreseeable future.

Let's hope the military keep making the point and the penny eventually drops. In the meantime it looks like the old George Porter quote "If sunbeams were weapons of war, we would have had solar energy centuries ago." mightn't be so far from the truth.



Tags: ,

Posted by Gareth Kane no responses

10 November 2014

Putting my money where my mouth is...


I've just made a modest investment in Triodos Renewables via the TrillionFund. This follows a smaller peer-to-peer loan to another renewables project I made earlier in the summer. My reasons are:

  • I want to build an income stream in addition to my consultancy and invest for my and my family's medium to long term future;
  • I want to make that investment to be environmentally- and ethically-sound (or as sound as it reasonably could be);
  • I want to do my bit for the renewables industry;
  • If I don't invest in green energy, how can I expect anybody else to do so?
  • I now have some 'skin in the game'. As with anything I have a monetary stake in, I will now take a lot more rigorous and objective interest in the topic - it's no longer an academic subject to dip into as and when I feel like it.

This last point is very important for all of us. I often ask clients or potential clients the killer question "what's your budget?" and usually get some stammering in reply.

No budget = no commitment.

When Sir Stuart Rose created Plan A at Marks & Spencer he gave it £200 million to get going - and didn't expect to see a direct financial return on that investment. That is commitment.

Do you have skin in the game?


Tags: , ,

Posted by Gareth Kane no responses

7 November 2014

"Why?" is the most powerful weapon in sustainability


One of the things I love about my job is I get to speak to people from a wide range of sectors - from charity shops to defence, from crazy golf course owners (really!) to national newspaper groups. On Wednesday I chalked up a new one - the laboratory sector when I was asked to talk about Green Jujitsu at LabInnovations2014.

One of the perks about these gigs is hearing other speakers - I've worked alongside sport legends such as Steve Backley and Ellen MacArthur - and this time the keynote was given by Robin Ince of Infinite Monkey Cage fame. He was very entertaining and made a wonderful case for being proud and excited by science for science's sake, never mind solving the world's problems.

Another highlight for me was Andrea Sella, Chemistry Prof at UCL and frequent Monkey Cage participant. Andrea is one of those ferociously intelligent people who has never lost that childhood knack of questioning absolutely everything - and has the manic energy to pursue any enquiry to its fundamentals. And he reminded me of the importance of asking Why? because the answer is usually "We've always done it like this."

Andrea told an anecdote about lab gloves at UCL. Every student entering a lab was being issued with gloves - a total of 250,000 per annum at a cost of £15k, even though:

  • Not all the chemicals the students were using were harmful;
  • The gloves don't actually protect your skin against many organic solvents such as toluene - giving a false sense of security;
  • Students spill more chemicals when they're wearing the gloves than when they don't.

He persuaded his Health & Safety people to only issue gloves when they were needed - and would actually make a difference (I would love to have sat in on that conversation). The result was a massive reduction in glove use, a cut in waste production and a decent financial saving - and no rise in accidents as the students take more care with bare hands.

You will be surprised how many decisions are made by default. Your job as a sustainability practitioner is to find your inner toddler and always ask "Why?" You may be surprised by the results.


Tags: , ,

Posted by Gareth Kane no responses

5 November 2014

How do you define sustainability?

In this edition of Ask Gareth, I discuss how to define sustainability in a way which makes sense to your fellow employees.

What do YOU think? Is this a valid approach or is it ducking the issue? Do you have a good definition of sustainability? Let's hear your views in the comments below!


You can see all editions of Ask Gareth by clicking here.

If you'd like to send a question to Ask Gareth fire away!.


Tags: , ,

Posted by Gareth Kane no responses

3 November 2014

Science Has Spoken (Again) - Now What?

IPCCSo the cycle goes around again. The International Panel on Climate Change produces its five yearly synthesis report on the state of climate change science and, instead of triggering an outburst of action, we get another rather dreary media debate between NGOs, climate change 'sceptics' and politicians of all stripes.

Given that the report says acting now will prove much easier than playing catch up in a decade, what do we need to do to get going? Here's my happen'th:

1. Political Leadership: Obama is trying to make climate change a core plank of his second term, but seems to be hobbled by his own mediocre popularity rankings and the rampant, take no prisoners climate change denial of his Republican opponents. Our own David Cameron blows hot and cold. Other industrial powerhouses such as China and Germany are doing their bit, but hardly showing international leadership - that is to left to relatively poor countries such as the Philippines and the Maldives to tug at our heartstrings. Who is going to stand up and lead?

2. Business Leadership: as I've said many times, leadership is the difference between the best at sustainability and the rest. Sustainability leadership cannot be delegated to middle management - it must come from the top. And actions speak louder than words - let's see some real ambition.

3. A Flexible International Framework: different countries will have different risks, opportunities, strengths and weaknesses, we need a framework which allows countries to thrive while cutting carbon. Action needs to be rewarded as much as inaction is punished.

4. Open Minds: the report concludes that no single mitigation or adaptation measure will solve climate change. We need every weapon in our arsenal - even some we may personally not like. This applies to economics as well as technology - we need economies of scale in clean technology which an anti-business mindset will hinder, not help. NGOs will have to learn when they are helping and when they are hindering and adjust aim their guns appropriately.

5. Smarter Communication: Different people respond to different words, phrases and visions and we need top not only accept that, but positively embrace it. A few weeks ago I praised David Cameron for his framing of carbon reduction from a centre-right point of view - green growth, not green tape. Centre left thinkers may respond better to a message around collaboration, regulation and community action. Which is right? Both.

6. Positivity: we must not let the scale of the task frighten us, failures stop us in our tracks, or those throwing abuse from the sidelines put us off. We have a goal, let's go and do it - and have some fun while we're at it!


Tags: , , , ,

Posted by Gareth Kane no responses

30 October 2014

I need your Pearls of Wisdom

YodaIt's that head-scratching time of year again - when I ask you for a pithy one-liner for my 'Green Business Pearls of Wisdom' series of Xmas publications.

So, have you had a profound thought, a flash of blinding light, or a brutal learning experience in the field of sustainability, environmentalism and/or corporate social responsibility in the last 12 months?

If so, boil it down to 140 characters and get it immortalised in pixels for the 2014 edition of Pearls of Wisdom - the sixth in the series. Originality scores well, as do thoughts that run contrary to conventional green wisdom.

Send them to me here.

Over to you!



Posted by Gareth Kane no responses

28 October 2014

Inspiring the Next Generation


My Mum died last Monday.

That's why this blog has been largely quiet for the last week - I've been in that weird bereavement hollow zone where only family matters and everything else - news, entertainment, work - just seems irrelevant, not to mention irritating. But we gave her a great send off last Thursday - it was standing room only at the funeral service - and I'm getting back into my normal routine.

My Mum was a nature lover and it definitely rubbed off on me. I remember her running the Nature club at my primary school and we went on many nature hikes along the Lagan in Belfast where I grew up. In her later years her passion for the birds which visited the garden meant that there was only one option for charitable donations in lieu of flowers - the RSPB. Her passion also inspired my kids, particularly my eldest, Harry, who would trade bird lists on a regular basis on our Sunday morning phone calls.

The closing stanza of Mum's funeral service went like this:

You can remember her and only that she is gone,
Or you can cherish her memory and let it live on.
You can cry and close your mind, be empty and turn your back,
Or you can do what she would want: smile, open your eyes, love and go on.

And that's what I intend to do - not only work for a better future for the next generation and the one after that, but to inspire them to take up the torch themselves. Not that kids need much encouragement!


Tags: ,

Posted by Gareth Kane no responses

21 October 2014

Sunk Costs Sink Sustainability Ambitions

piggybanksTime and time again, clients tell me "if only we'd factored this in before we invested in that new boiler [or whatever] - bad timing!"

Sunk costs - those capital investments where the cash cannot easily be recovered - are a real headache for sustainability ambitions as no-one wants to be seen to 'waste' that money, even if ripping out a relatively new piece of kit and replacing it with a more sustainable one is the economically sensible thing to do.

The answer, of course, is to get in there before the investment is made and get the most sustainable bang for your buck. But this simple action is much more difficult in practice as the most restricting decisions are often made by default before any investment appraisal takes place.

The only answer is to have a clear sustainability strategy, with appropriate stretch targets, embedded into the structure of the organisation. Trying to waylay every investment reactively as it comes over the horizon is like trying to rugby tackle charging elephants - it's never going to end well.


Tags: ,

Posted by Gareth Kane no responses

17 October 2014

The Answer My Friend, Is Blowing In the Wind...

turbineInteresting news recently:

  • Glasgow University ad committed “to fully disinvesting from fossil fuel industry companies”, subject to reassurance that the financial impact for the university would be “acceptable”. Full divestment will mean the reallocation of around £18 million of investments, which will take place over a 10-year period.
  • The Rockefeller Brothers Fund is joining a coalition of philanthropists pledging to rid themselves of more than $50bn (£31bn) in fossil fuel assets - and putting them into renewables instead.
  • Worldwide spending on renewable-energy projects reached $175 billion in the first three quarters of 2014, up 16 percent from the same period a year ago.
  • China could add 14 gigawatts of solar capacity this year alone - more than all the solar power installed in the United States.

Puts all that anti-renewables nonsense spouted by the likes of Owen Paterson into perspective doesn't it?


Tags: ,

Posted by Gareth Kane no responses

15 October 2014

Horses for (Sustainability) Courses

Gareth KaneIn my executive coaching, I try to adhere to the Socratic/pull model where you guide the coachee along with a series of searching questions. The idea is they get to work through the problem themselves, getting a deeper understanding, and they're more likely to implement the resulting ideas - just in the same way I use workshops in place of traditional 'clipboard' consulting.

This patient approach is against my nature, which is to jump in with advice before the other person has stopped talking. It takes quite a bit of discipline not to butt in all the time.

But with one coaching client, I have to drop this approach and push advice. This particular business owner wants to bounce ideas off me, talk through what is and isn't working and ask me what I would do in certain circumstances. If I suggest something to him, he'll roll it around in his head and work out how to make it work for him in practice.

I'm the opposite - despite my enthusiasm for giving advice, I'm not that great at taking it. I had a consulting coach for a year and while I valued his advice, I always felt he was trying to corral me in particular direction rather than let me think things through. I spent most of my time telling him why his advice wouldn't work for me, which wasn't very productive.

At the end of the day it doesn't matter which approach is 'better' - or worse 'right' (although I find for most people the pull approach works best and so it's my default). What really matters is doing what is best for your audience - Green Jujitsu in other words. It takes humility to work to their preferred way of learning rather than your favoured methodology.

And that's my advice.



Tags: , , ,

Posted by Gareth Kane no responses

13 October 2014

On Sustainability: Go Big or Go Home

Athlete compete in paul vault

The first four of my rules of pragmatic environmentalism were mainly aimed at the old-school green activism mindset which in my opinion holds us back from the rapid progress we need to make. But this last, fifth rule is aimed at us all.

For too long we have been told that we face existential threats, but are given '10 Top Tips' such as reusing plastic bags and not leaving the TV on standby. While there's nothing wrong with doing these, they won't deliver sustainability on their own and the cognitive dissonance between the threat and the action can switch people off as its like firing a pea shooter at an aircraft carrier.

We need to go big, or go home.

Two weeks ago today I submitted the manuscript for my next DoShort book, provisionally titled Accelerating Sustainability using the 80:20 Rule. The 80:20 rule says that, in many cases, 20% of actions/effort/input give us 80% of results and 80% of actions give us just 20%. This is a phenomenally powerful tool as it allows us to cut away all the extraneous activity - all those networks of green champions, endless supplier questionnaires and jute bags of green goodies - and focus on those things which will make a real difference - such as ditching a low sustainability supplier in favour of one with good sustainability credentials, or substituting secondary materials for virgin materials, or purchasing an electric vehicle fleet.

Along with the 80:20 Rule, a restless mindset of "good, we've done that, but it's not enough, how can we do it better?" will keep you out of your comfort zone and continually reaching for the next level.

And one of the most powerful moves is the stretch target - if you set your sights on cutting your carbon emissions by, say, 50% in 10 years, you will come up with much better projects than you will if your target is 5% by next year.

So set the bar high, clear it, then push it higher. You may just surprise yourself!


Tags: , , ,

Posted by Gareth Kane no responses

10 October 2014

Will we get political leadership on sustainability in 2015?

political leaders2
The UK political conference season has come to an end, the last before the General Election scheduled for May 2015. So, with manifestos starting to take shape, and given that leadership on green issues is the difference between leaps forward and incremental improvements in sustainability, how much leadership did the main party leaders show? Here's my summary (with the usual disclosure that I'm a member of the Liberal Democrats, but I'll try to be objective!):

First up was Ed Miliband, Labour leader. His speech was wildly derided for flogging to death the already knackered 'I met a normal person recently who thinks just like me' trope and for forgetting to mention the yawning economic deficit. But he did remember to cover green issues (he forgot them in 2012), and it was good, clear stuff, making green jobs one of his 6 goals for the next parliament if he takes the keys to No 10 next year:

So our third national goal is for Britain to be truly a world leader in Green technology by 2025, creating one million new jobs as we do.

Under this government, Britain is behind Germany, Japan, the United States and even India and China for low-carbon, green technologies and services. So many of our brilliant businesses are desperate to play their part in creating their jobs of the future but they just can’t do it unless government does its bit. With our plan, we will.

Making a clear commitment to take the carbon out of our electricity by 2030. A Green Investment Bank with real powers to borrow and attract investment. And as Caroline Flint announced yesterday, devolving power to our communities so that we can insulate 5 million homes. The environment may not be fashionable as a political issue any more. But I believe it is incredibly important to our economy today. And it is the most important thing I can do in politics for the future of my kids and their generation.

The second leader to speak was Conservative Prime Minister David Cameron, back from the UN where he gave the first speech on climate change by a British PM since Margaret Thatcher in 1990. He said some very interesting things then, but I said the litmus test would be how much of a priority he gave it when addressing the party faithful. He flunked it. To say green issues got a token mention is stretching the meaning of 'token', with Cameron merely mentioning 'Britain leading the battle against climate change' in passing. His green/blue 'green growth, not green tape' message at the UN could have, and should have, been a compelling pitch to bring round the anti-green forces in his party, but given he has just lost a couple of his MPs to the maverick, climate change-denying UKIP, one can only assume that he decided not to rock the boat.

Lastly, Nick Clegg, Liberal Democrat Leader and Deputy Prime Minister took to the podium. His party may be languishing in the polls and his personal ratings at rock bottom, but with another tight election in prospect, it is very possible that he will find himself in negotiation to form another coalition Government next year. Clegg made several references to environmental issues throughout his speech, but two passages were important, the first being to claim credit for progress under the current Government:

And just as we are refusing to saddle our children with mountains of debt, we are determined to hand them on a clean planet too. Both parties in this Government promised we would stick to our green commitments, but it has taken constant pressure from the Liberal Democrats – not least Ed Davey – to hold the Tories to their word. And I can tell you now that a sustainable environment will remain at the heart of our vision for Britain’s future – it’s not green crap to us.

That last line was a potshot at what Cameron is alleged to have said about green taxes on electricity production. Clegg later returned to the theme to set out five green laws:

...if you want to spread opportunity you can’t just stop at today. You have to think about tomorrow too. And for that same reason, our next manifesto will contain something I can guarantee you none of the others will: A commitment to five green laws. Laws that will commit British governments to reducing carbon from our electricity sector…Create new, legal targets for clean air and water…Give everyone access to green space… Massively boost energy efficiency and renewable energy… Prioritise the shift to green cars…Bring an end to dirty coal… Because Liberal Democrats understand that opportunity for everyone means thinking not just of this generation, but of future generations too.

So, in summary, Miliband and Clegg not only made clear commitments on sustainability, but sketched in some of the important detail behind that - as much as you can be expected to in a wide-ranging speech. Cameron flattered to deceive - if he means what he said at the UN, then we have something of a political consensus, but any personal commitment won't count unless steps up and shows leadership - to the public, to industry and to his party faithful.


Tags: , ,

Posted by Gareth Kane no responses

8 October 2014

The Littlest (Sustainability) Hobo

I've got a really random and retro ear worm. I can't get the theme from 'The Littlest Hobo' out of my mind. You know the one:

"Maybe tomorrow, I'll want to settle down,
Until tomorrow, I'll just keep moving on."

By coincidence I have been finishing off the manuscript of my latest (fifth) book where I identified this kind of restlessness as a key attribute of the best in sustainability - "OK, we've done good, but it's not enough, how can we do better?"

If you want to install such a restlessness, some or all of the following will help:

  • Learn by doing - keep trying new things and keep what works;
  • Allow people to fail - a blame culture stifles innovation;
  • Celebrate success - show everyone what people like them can achieve;
  • Ask for solutions from everyone involved - inside and outside the organisation;
  • Creative destruction - keep pushing the company forwards by calling time on unsustainable practice/products/systems.

And going back to everybody's favourite canine good Samaritan:

Down this road that never seems to end,
Where new adventure lies just around the bend.

Let's make it an epic adventure of discovery, not a dull march of green tape!


Tags: , , ,

Posted by Gareth Kane no responses

6 October 2014

If this is war, we must use all the weapons at our disposal


Every Monday for the last couple of weeks, I've been mulling on one of my proposed Rules of the Pragmatic Environmentalist. This week, it is Rule 4: "Technology and markets mechanisms are powerful tools: we must use them to our advantage."

One of my favourite sustainability reads has been The God Species by Mark Lynas- mainly because it is so joyfully contrarian, kicking tired old green tropes and making a daring proposition (I paraphrase):

If we are wreaking biblical levels of destruction on the planet, we'd better use our 'god-like' technologies to stop the damage before it is too late.

Like Lynas, one of my great frustrations with the activist end of the environmental movement is their near-religious belief that the most powerful weapons in our armoury - capitalism, GM technology, market-based solutions, nuclear energy to name a few - are evil. Every time something is proposed it gets knocked down as, at best, not good enough, at worst, the works of the devil. Biodiesel = bad. Carbon offsetting = immoral. Feed-In Tariffs = enrich the rich etc, etc.

Fortunately none of the people peddling these dictates actually has to propose something that works. If you do get a solution, it's something vaguely along the lines of reorganising society into modern villages, going back to the land, growing nuts and whittling sticks.

Now I love a bit of whittling, but let's get real - if we want change and we want change fast, then we've got to harness the powerful tools that we have at our disposal, not shy away from them. Let's get our hands dirty!


Tags: , , , , ,

Posted by Gareth Kane no responses

3 October 2014

How Is ISO14001 Changing? Interview with Marek Bidwell

In this very special edition of Ask Gareth, I get to ask the questions! I have been asked about the forthcoming changes to ISO14001, and to cover up my ignorance, I invited my friend, colleague and ISO-geek Marek Bidwell to outline what will happen and when.

You can see all editions of Ask Gareth by clicking here.

If you'd like to send a question to Ask Gareth fire away!


Tags: , , ,

Posted by Gareth Kane no responses

1 October 2014

California is banning plastic bags. Big Deal.

shopping plastic bag

Have you read the headlines in the press that the State of California is going to ban single use plastic bags in large supermarkets?

Well, sound the trumpets.

Why my cynicism? Well, taking the average UK citizen  - plastic bags represent about 0.1% of our individual carbon footprint, whereas, by comparison, heating our homes represents 10% (I don't have the equivalent Californian data to hand, but I suspect it is similar but with cooling rather than heating). You don't have to a mathematical genius to realise that a very modest improvement in home insulation regulations would easily outstrip a complete removal of single use plastic bags from the economy.

Let's focus on what matters, shall we?


Tags: ,

Posted by Gareth Kane 2 responses

Free monthly bulletin:

Learn how to help your business go green from the comfort of your desk..

View events

By Gareth Kane

Everything you need to know to integrate sustainability into the DNA of your business.

Submit button

By Gareth Kane

A highly accessible, practical guide to those who want to introduce sustainability into their business or organization quickly and effectively.

Submit button

By Gareth Kane

The smart way to engage effectively with employees

View events